Organizational Charts: What Are They?

In the intricate world of business, clarity and structure are paramount to success. One of the most effective tools for achieving this clarity is the organizational chart. These visual representations of a company’s structure not only delineate roles and responsibilities but also foster communication and collaboration among team members. Whether you’re a seasoned executive, a new manager, or an aspiring entrepreneur, understanding organizational charts is essential for navigating the complexities of any organization.

In this article, we will explore the fundamental aspects of organizational charts, including their purpose, types, and the benefits they offer to organizations of all sizes. You will learn how to create an effective chart that reflects your company’s unique structure and enhances operational efficiency. By the end, you’ll have a comprehensive understanding of how organizational charts can serve as a powerful tool for strategic planning and team alignment, ultimately driving your organization toward its goals.

Types of Organizational Charts

Organizational charts are visual representations of a company’s structure, illustrating the relationships and relative ranks of its parts and positions. They serve as a roadmap for understanding how an organization operates, who reports to whom, and how different departments or teams interact. There are several types of organizational charts, each suited to different organizational structures and needs. We will explore five primary types of organizational charts: hierarchical, matrix, flat, network, and hybrid organizational charts.

Hierarchical Organizational Charts

Hierarchical organizational charts are perhaps the most traditional and widely recognized type of organizational chart. They depict a clear chain of command, with the highest-ranking individuals at the top and lower-level employees branching out below. This structure is often represented in a top-down format, where each level of the hierarchy is clearly defined.

In a hierarchical chart, the organization is divided into various levels, typically including:

• Top Management: This includes positions such as the CEO, president, or executive director, who are responsible for the overall direction and strategy of the organization.
• Middle Management: Managers at this level oversee specific departments or divisions, such as marketing, finance, or human resources. They report directly to top management and are responsible for implementing policies and strategies.
• Lower Management: This includes supervisors and team leaders who manage day-to-day operations and report to middle management.
• Staff Employees: These are the individuals who carry out the tasks and responsibilities assigned to them, often working in specialized roles.

For example, in a hierarchical organizational chart for a manufacturing company, the CEO would be at the top, followed by the COO and CFO, then department heads for production, quality control, and logistics, and finally, the factory workers at the bottom. This structure is beneficial for organizations that require clear lines of authority and accountability.

Matrix Organizational Charts

Matrix organizational charts represent a more complex structure that combines elements of both hierarchical and flat organizational charts. In a matrix structure, employees report to multiple managers, typically one for their functional area and another for their project or product line. This dual reporting system allows for greater flexibility and collaboration across departments.

Matrix organizational charts are particularly useful in organizations that operate in dynamic environments, such as technology or consulting firms, where projects often require input from various functional areas. For instance, a software development company might have a matrix structure where a software engineer reports to both the engineering manager and the project manager for a specific product.

While matrix organizational charts can enhance communication and resource sharing, they can also lead to confusion and conflict over authority. Clear communication and defined roles are essential to ensure that employees understand their responsibilities and reporting relationships.

Flat Organizational Charts

Flat organizational charts, also known as horizontal organizational charts, feature few or no levels of middle management between staff and executives. This structure promotes a more egalitarian approach, where employees have more autonomy and are encouraged to take initiative. In a flat organization, decision-making is often decentralized, allowing teams to respond quickly to changes and challenges.

Flat organizational charts are commonly found in startups and small businesses, where the need for agility and innovation is paramount. For example, a small tech startup may have a flat structure where all employees, including the CEO, work collaboratively on projects without the constraints of a rigid hierarchy.

While flat organizational charts can foster a culture of collaboration and creativity, they may also present challenges, such as role ambiguity and potential difficulties in scaling as the organization grows. As companies expand, they may need to introduce more structure to maintain efficiency and clarity.

Network Organizational Charts

Network organizational charts illustrate a structure that emphasizes relationships and collaborations between various organizations or entities rather than a strict hierarchy. This type of chart is particularly relevant in industries where partnerships, alliances, and outsourcing are common, such as in the technology and service sectors.

In a network organizational chart, the organization is depicted as a central hub connected to various external entities, such as suppliers, partners, and customers. This structure allows organizations to leverage external resources and expertise while maintaining flexibility and adaptability.

For example, a marketing agency may have a network organizational chart that includes its internal team, freelance designers, content creators, and media partners. This interconnected approach enables the agency to scale its services and respond to client needs more effectively.

Hybrid Organizational Charts

Hybrid organizational charts combine elements from various organizational structures to create a customized approach that meets the specific needs of an organization. This flexibility allows organizations to adapt their structure based on their size, industry, and strategic goals.

A hybrid organizational chart may incorporate aspects of hierarchical, matrix, flat, and network structures, depending on the organization’s requirements. For instance, a large corporation may use a hierarchical structure for its core operations while adopting a matrix approach for project-based work, allowing for both stability and flexibility.

For example, a multinational corporation might have a hybrid structure where regional managers operate within a hierarchical framework, while project teams formed for specific initiatives utilize a matrix approach to draw on expertise from various departments. This adaptability can enhance innovation and responsiveness while maintaining clear lines of authority.

Components of an Organizational Chart

Organizational charts are visual representations of a company’s structure, illustrating the relationships and hierarchies within an organization. Understanding the components of an organizational chart is crucial for interpreting its meaning and effectively utilizing it for management and communication purposes. This section delves into the key components of an organizational chart, including nodes and positions, lines and relationships, levels and hierarchies, and annotations and symbols.

Nodes and Positions

At the heart of any organizational chart are the nodes, which represent individual positions or roles within the organization. Each node typically contains the title of the position and may also include the name of the person currently occupying that role. For example, in a simple organizational chart for a marketing department, you might see nodes labeled as “Marketing Manager,” “Content Strategist,” and “Social Media Coordinator.”

Nodes can vary in size and shape depending on the type of organizational chart being used. In a hierarchical chart, for instance, nodes are often rectangular, while in a radial chart, they may be circular. The design choice can affect how easily the information is conveyed, so it’s essential to choose a format that enhances clarity.

Moreover, nodes can be color-coded to represent different departments, levels of seniority, or other categorizations. For example, all executive-level positions might be shaded in blue, while mid-level management could be in green. This visual differentiation helps viewers quickly identify roles and their respective levels within the organization.

Lines and Relationships

The lines connecting the nodes in an organizational chart are equally important, as they illustrate the relationships between different positions. These lines can indicate various types of relationships, such as:

• Direct Reporting Lines: Solid lines typically represent direct reporting relationships, showing who reports to whom. For instance, if the “Marketing Manager” node has a solid line connecting it to the “Content Strategist” node, it indicates that the Content Strategist reports directly to the Marketing Manager.
• Advisory Relationships: Dashed lines may be used to indicate advisory or secondary relationships. For example, if a “Senior Marketing Consultant” provides guidance to the “Marketing Manager,” a dashed line might connect these two nodes.
• Collaborative Relationships: In some charts, lines may also represent collaborative relationships between departments or teams. For instance, a line connecting the “Sales Department” node to the “Marketing Department” node can signify a collaborative effort between these two areas.

Understanding these lines is crucial for grasping the dynamics of an organization. They not only show the hierarchy but also highlight the collaborative nature of various roles, which is essential for fostering teamwork and communication.

Levels and Hierarchies

Organizational charts are often structured in a way that reflects the levels and hierarchies within an organization. Typically, the highest level of the organization, such as the CEO or President, is placed at the top of the chart, with subsequent levels cascading downwards. This top-down approach visually represents the chain of command and the flow of authority.

In a traditional hierarchical structure, you might see several layers, such as:

• Executive Level: This includes top executives like the CEO, CFO, and COO, who are responsible for the overall direction and strategy of the organization.
• Management Level: Below the executives are the various managers (e.g., department heads) who oversee specific areas of the organization, such as marketing, finance, and operations.
• Staff Level: At the bottom of the hierarchy are the staff members or employees who carry out the day-to-day tasks and responsibilities.

However, not all organizations follow a strict hierarchical model. Some may adopt a flat structure, where there are fewer levels of management, promoting a more collaborative and less formal environment. In such cases, the organizational chart may appear more like a network, with nodes of similar size and importance, reflecting a culture of equality and shared responsibility.

Annotations and Symbols

To enhance the clarity and functionality of an organizational chart, various annotations and symbols can be employed. These elements provide additional context and information that may not be immediately apparent from the nodes and lines alone. Common annotations and symbols include:

• Color Coding: As mentioned earlier, color coding can be used to differentiate between departments, levels of seniority, or even project teams. This visual cue helps viewers quickly identify the structure of the organization.
• Icons: Icons can be used to represent specific roles or functions. For example, a briefcase icon might denote a managerial position, while a gear icon could represent a technical role.
• Footnotes or Legends: A legend or footnote can provide explanations for any symbols or color codes used in the chart, ensuring that viewers understand the information being presented.
• Contact Information: In some cases, organizational charts may include contact information for key personnel, making it easier for employees to reach out to the right individuals for collaboration or inquiries.

By incorporating these annotations and symbols, an organizational chart becomes not just a static representation of structure but a dynamic tool for communication and collaboration within the organization.

The components of an organizational chart—nodes and positions, lines and relationships, levels and hierarchies, and annotations and symbols—work together to create a comprehensive visual representation of an organization’s structure. Understanding these components is essential for effectively interpreting and utilizing organizational charts in a business context.

Benefits of Using Organizational Charts

Organizational charts, often referred to as org charts, are visual representations of a company’s structure. They illustrate the relationships and relative ranks of positions within an organization. While they may seem like simple diagrams, the benefits of using organizational charts are profound and multifaceted. We will explore the key advantages of implementing organizational charts in a business setting, including improved communication, enhanced clarity and transparency, better resource management, and facilitating strategic planning.

Improved Communication

One of the primary benefits of organizational charts is their ability to enhance communication within an organization. By providing a clear visual representation of the hierarchy and reporting relationships, org charts help employees understand who to approach for specific issues or inquiries. This clarity reduces confusion and streamlines communication processes.

For instance, in a large corporation, an employee may be unsure whether to report a problem to their immediate supervisor or to a department head. An organizational chart clearly delineates the chain of command, allowing employees to identify the appropriate person to contact. This not only saves time but also fosters a culture of open communication, where employees feel empowered to reach out to the right individuals.

Moreover, organizational charts can facilitate cross-departmental communication. When employees understand how different teams are structured and who leads them, they can collaborate more effectively. For example, if a marketing team needs to work with the sales department, an org chart can help them identify the key players in each department, making it easier to establish connections and share information.

Enhanced Clarity and Transparency

Organizational charts provide a clear and transparent view of an organization’s structure. This clarity is essential for both new and existing employees. For newcomers, an org chart serves as a roadmap to navigate the company, helping them understand the roles and responsibilities of their colleagues. This understanding can significantly reduce the onboarding time and help new hires acclimate to the company culture more quickly.

For existing employees, organizational charts can clarify changes in structure, such as promotions, new hires, or departmental shifts. When an organization undergoes restructuring, an updated org chart can help employees understand how these changes affect their roles and responsibilities. This transparency can alleviate uncertainty and anxiety, fostering a more stable work environment.

Additionally, clarity in organizational structure can enhance accountability. When roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, it becomes easier to hold individuals accountable for their tasks. For example, if a project fails to meet its objectives, an org chart can help identify who was responsible for each aspect of the project, facilitating a constructive review process.

Better Resource Management

Effective resource management is crucial for any organization, and organizational charts play a significant role in this area. By visualizing the structure of the organization, leaders can identify areas where resources may be underutilized or overextended. This insight allows for more strategic allocation of personnel, budget, and time.

For example, if an org chart reveals that one department is significantly larger than another, management can assess whether the workload is evenly distributed. If one team is overwhelmed while another is under-resourced, adjustments can be made to balance the workload, ensuring that all teams operate efficiently.

Moreover, organizational charts can help identify skill gaps within the organization. By analyzing the structure and the roles within it, leaders can pinpoint areas where additional training or hiring may be necessary. For instance, if a tech company’s org chart shows a lack of data analysts, the management can prioritize hiring in that area to enhance their data-driven decision-making capabilities.

Furthermore, resource management extends beyond human resources. Organizational charts can also help in managing projects and initiatives. By visualizing project teams and their reporting structures, leaders can ensure that projects are staffed appropriately and that team members have clear lines of communication. This clarity can lead to more successful project outcomes and a more efficient use of resources.

Facilitating Strategic Planning

Strategic planning is essential for the long-term success of any organization, and organizational charts can be invaluable tools in this process. By providing a clear overview of the current organizational structure, leaders can assess whether it aligns with the company’s strategic goals. This alignment is crucial for ensuring that the organization is positioned to achieve its objectives.

For instance, if a company aims to expand into new markets, its organizational structure may need to evolve to support this goal. An org chart can help leaders visualize how to best structure teams to focus on market research, product development, and sales strategies. By identifying the necessary roles and relationships, leaders can make informed decisions about restructuring or reallocating resources.

Additionally, organizational charts can aid in succession planning. By mapping out the current structure and identifying key positions, leaders can develop plans for future leadership transitions. This foresight is essential for maintaining continuity and stability within the organization. For example, if a senior executive is nearing retirement, an org chart can help identify potential successors and the skills they may need to develop to step into that role effectively.

Moreover, as organizations grow and evolve, their strategic priorities may shift. Regularly updating organizational charts ensures that the structure remains aligned with the company’s goals. This practice not only helps in strategic planning but also fosters a culture of adaptability, where employees are encouraged to embrace change and innovation.

The benefits of using organizational charts extend far beyond mere visual representation. They play a crucial role in improving communication, enhancing clarity and transparency, better managing resources, and facilitating strategic planning. By leveraging the insights provided by organizational charts, organizations can create a more efficient, accountable, and strategically aligned workplace.

How to Create an Organizational Chart

Identifying Key Roles and Responsibilities

Creating an effective organizational chart begins with a clear understanding of the key roles and responsibilities within your organization. This foundational step is crucial as it sets the stage for how the chart will be structured and what information it will convey.

To identify key roles, start by conducting a thorough analysis of your organization’s structure. This can involve reviewing job descriptions, interviewing team leaders, and gathering input from employees at various levels. Consider the following aspects:

• Hierarchy: Determine the levels of management and staff within your organization. Who reports to whom? Understanding the chain of command is essential for accurately representing relationships.
• Departments and Teams: Identify the different departments or teams within your organization. Each department may have its own hierarchy and roles that need to be represented in the chart.
• Roles and Responsibilities: Clearly define the responsibilities associated with each role. This will help in understanding how different positions interact and collaborate.
• Key Functions: Highlight any critical functions that may not fit neatly into a department but are essential for the organization’s success.

For example, in a marketing department, you might identify roles such as Marketing Manager, Content Strategist, Social Media Coordinator, and Graphic Designer. Each of these roles has distinct responsibilities that contribute to the overall marketing strategy.

Choosing the Right Type of Chart

Once you have identified the key roles and responsibilities, the next step is to choose the right type of organizational chart. There are several formats available, each serving different purposes and audiences:

• Hierarchical Chart: This is the most common type of organizational chart, displaying a top-down structure. It is ideal for traditional organizations where authority flows from the top down.
• Matrix Chart: A matrix organizational chart illustrates a more complex structure where employees report to multiple managers. This is often used in project-based organizations where team members may work across different projects.
• Flat Chart: In a flat organizational chart, there are few or no levels of middle management between staff and executives. This format is suitable for startups or small businesses that emphasize collaboration and egalitarianism.
• Network Chart: This type of chart is useful for organizations that operate in a decentralized manner, showcasing relationships and collaborations between various entities or teams.

Choosing the right type of chart depends on your organization’s structure and the message you want to convey. For instance, a hierarchical chart may be best for a large corporation, while a flat chart might be more appropriate for a small, agile startup.

Using Software Tools and Templates

Creating an organizational chart can be a tough task, especially if you are doing it manually. Fortunately, there are numerous software tools and templates available that can simplify the process. Here are some popular options:

• Microsoft Visio: A powerful diagramming tool that offers a variety of templates for creating organizational charts. It allows for easy customization and integration with other Microsoft Office applications.
• Lucidchart: An online diagramming application that provides a user-friendly interface for creating organizational charts. It offers collaboration features, making it easy for teams to work together in real-time.
• Canva: Known for its design capabilities, Canva also offers templates for organizational charts. It is particularly useful for those who want to create visually appealing charts without extensive design skills.
• Google Slides: A free tool that allows users to create simple organizational charts. It is accessible and easy to use, making it a good option for teams already using Google Workspace.

When using these tools, take advantage of pre-made templates to save time. Most software options allow you to customize colors, fonts, and layouts to align with your organization’s branding.

Best Practices for Design and Layout

Designing an organizational chart is not just about placing boxes and lines on a page; it’s about creating a clear and effective visual representation of your organization. Here are some best practices to consider:

• Keep It Simple: Avoid cluttering the chart with excessive information. Focus on the essential roles and relationships. Use clear labels and limit the amount of text within each box.
• Use Consistent Shapes and Colors: Consistency in design helps improve readability. Use the same shape for similar roles (e.g., all management roles in rectangles, all staff roles in circles) and a consistent color scheme that aligns with your brand.
• Clearly Define Relationships: Use lines or arrows to indicate reporting relationships. Ensure that these connections are easy to follow, avoiding any ambiguity about who reports to whom.
• Include Contact Information: For larger organizations, consider including contact information or a brief description of each role. This can be particularly useful for new employees or external stakeholders.
• Regularly Update the Chart: An organizational chart is a living document that should be updated regularly to reflect changes in roles, responsibilities, or organizational structure. Set a schedule for reviewing and updating the chart to ensure it remains accurate.

For example, if your organization undergoes a merger or restructuring, it’s essential to update the organizational chart promptly to reflect the new hierarchy and roles. This not only helps employees understand their place within the organization but also aids in onboarding new hires.

Creating an organizational chart is a vital process that requires careful consideration of roles, structure, and design. By following these steps and best practices, you can develop a clear and effective organizational chart that enhances communication and understanding within your organization.

Common Challenges and Solutions

Keeping the Chart Updated

One of the most significant challenges organizations face with their organizational charts is keeping them updated. As companies grow, restructure, or undergo changes in personnel, the organizational chart can quickly become outdated. An outdated chart can lead to confusion regarding roles, responsibilities, and reporting structures, which can hinder productivity and communication.

To address this challenge, organizations should implement a regular review process for their organizational charts. This could involve setting a specific timeline, such as quarterly or bi-annually, to review and update the chart. Additionally, assigning a dedicated individual or team to oversee the chart’s maintenance can ensure that updates are made promptly. Utilizing software tools that allow for easy modifications and real-time updates can also streamline this process. For instance, platforms like Lucidchart or Microsoft Visio offer collaborative features that enable multiple users to edit and update the chart simultaneously.

Managing Complex Structures

As organizations expand, they often develop complex structures that can be challenging to represent visually. Multi-departmental teams, matrix organizations, and cross-functional collaborations can create intricate relationships that are difficult to depict in a traditional hierarchical chart. This complexity can lead to misunderstandings about reporting lines and team dynamics.

To effectively manage complex structures, organizations can consider using alternative chart formats. For example, a matrix organizational chart can illustrate dual reporting relationships, while a network diagram can represent collaborative relationships across departments. Additionally, incorporating color coding or symbols can help clarify roles and relationships within the chart. Training employees on how to interpret these complex charts can also enhance understanding and reduce confusion.

Ensuring Accuracy and Consistency

Accuracy and consistency are crucial for the effectiveness of an organizational chart. Inaccurate information can lead to miscommunication, misplaced responsibilities, and a lack of accountability. Furthermore, inconsistencies in how roles and departments are represented can create confusion among employees.

To ensure accuracy, organizations should establish a clear process for gathering and verifying information before it is added to the chart. This may involve cross-referencing with HR records, conducting interviews with department heads, and soliciting feedback from employees. Regular audits of the organizational chart can also help identify discrepancies and ensure that all information is current and accurate.

Consistency can be achieved by developing standardized templates and guidelines for creating and updating the chart. This includes defining how roles are labeled, how departments are organized, and what symbols or colors are used. Providing training for employees on these standards can further promote consistency across the organization.

Addressing Resistance to Change

Change is often met with resistance, and this is particularly true when it comes to organizational charts. Employees may feel uncertain about new reporting structures, fear job loss, or simply be resistant to altering established routines. This resistance can hinder the successful implementation of a new organizational chart and can lead to decreased morale and productivity.

To address resistance to change, organizations should prioritize communication and transparency. Clearly explaining the reasons behind changes to the organizational chart and how they will benefit the organization and its employees can help alleviate concerns. Involving employees in the change process by soliciting their input and feedback can also foster a sense of ownership and acceptance.

Additionally, providing training and resources to help employees understand the new structure can ease the transition. This could include workshops, Q&A sessions, or one-on-one meetings with managers. Recognizing and addressing individual concerns can also help mitigate resistance and promote a smoother transition.

Future Trends in Organizational Charts

Digital and Interactive Charts

As organizations continue to evolve in the digital age, traditional static organizational charts are being replaced by digital and interactive versions. These modern charts not only provide a visual representation of the organizational structure but also enhance user engagement and accessibility. Digital organizational charts can be created using various software tools that allow for easy updates and modifications, ensuring that the information remains current and relevant.

Interactive charts take this a step further by enabling users to click on different sections to reveal more information about specific roles, departments, or individuals. For instance, a user might click on a department head’s name to see their responsibilities, team members, and even performance metrics. This level of interactivity fosters a deeper understanding of the organization and promotes transparency.

Moreover, digital charts can be integrated with other tools and platforms, such as project management software and communication tools, allowing for seamless navigation between different aspects of the organization. This integration not only enhances the user experience but also supports better collaboration and communication among team members.

Integration with HR and Management Systems

Another significant trend in the evolution of organizational charts is their integration with Human Resources (HR) and management systems. As organizations increasingly rely on data-driven decision-making, the ability to connect organizational charts with HR systems becomes crucial. This integration allows for a more comprehensive view of the workforce, including employee skills, performance metrics, and career progression.

For example, when an organization implements a new HR management system, the organizational chart can automatically update to reflect changes in personnel, such as promotions, new hires, or departmental restructuring. This real-time synchronization ensures that all stakeholders have access to the most accurate and up-to-date information.

Furthermore, integrating organizational charts with performance management systems can provide insights into team dynamics and productivity. Managers can analyze how team structures impact performance and make informed decisions about resource allocation, team composition, and succession planning. This holistic approach to organizational management not only enhances operational efficiency but also supports employee development and engagement.

Real-Time Updates and Analytics

In today’s fast-paced business environment, the ability to make real-time updates to organizational charts is becoming increasingly important. Organizations are recognizing the need for agility and responsiveness, and real-time updates allow them to adapt quickly to changes in the market or internal structure.

With advancements in technology, many organizational chart tools now offer features that enable automatic updates based on predefined criteria. For instance, if an employee leaves the company or a new team is formed, the organizational chart can be adjusted instantly, ensuring that all stakeholders are aware of the changes. This capability minimizes confusion and helps maintain clarity within the organization.

Additionally, the incorporation of analytics into organizational charts is a growing trend. By analyzing data related to team structures, employee performance, and departmental interactions, organizations can gain valuable insights into their operations. For example, analytics can reveal patterns in communication and collaboration, helping leaders identify potential bottlenecks or areas for improvement. This data-driven approach empowers organizations to make strategic decisions that enhance overall performance and employee satisfaction.

Customization and Personalization

As organizations become more diverse and complex, the need for customization and personalization in organizational charts is becoming increasingly apparent. Different teams and departments may require unique representations of their structures, and one-size-fits-all solutions are often inadequate.

Modern organizational chart tools offer a range of customization options, allowing users to tailor the visual representation to their specific needs. For instance, a marketing team may choose to highlight project-based structures, while a sales team might focus on individual performance metrics. This level of customization ensures that the organizational chart is not only informative but also relevant to the specific audience it serves.

Personalization goes beyond mere aesthetics; it also involves adapting the content and functionality of the organizational chart to meet the needs of different users. For example, executives may require a high-level overview of the organization, while team leaders may need detailed information about their direct reports. By providing personalized views, organizations can enhance user engagement and ensure that everyone has access to the information they need to perform their roles effectively.

Furthermore, the trend towards customization and personalization is also reflected in the design of organizational charts. Many tools now allow users to incorporate branding elements, such as logos and color schemes, to create a cohesive visual identity. This not only enhances the chart’s appeal but also reinforces the organization’s brand and culture.

The future of organizational charts is being shaped by technological advancements and the evolving needs of organizations. Digital and interactive charts, integration with HR and management systems, real-time updates and analytics, and customization and personalization are all key trends that are transforming how organizations visualize and manage their structures. As these trends continue to develop, organizations that embrace these changes will be better positioned to navigate the complexities of the modern business landscape.

CVzen Recommends

Learn & Implement Pivot Charts in Excel: Ultimate Guide Future-Mindedness: The Key Mindset for Organizational Success Organizational Structure: Importance and Key Benefits